Categories:
Audio (13)
Biotech (29)
Bytecode (36)
Database (77)
Framework (7)
Game (7)
General (507)
Graphics (53)
I/O (35)
IDE (2)
JAR Tools (101)
JavaBeans (21)
JDBC (121)
JDK (426)
JSP (20)
Logging (108)
Mail (58)
Messaging (8)
Network (84)
PDF (97)
Report (7)
Scripting (84)
Security (32)
Server (121)
Servlet (26)
SOAP (24)
Testing (54)
Web (15)
XML (309)
Collections:
Other Resources:
JDK 11 java.base.jmod - Base Module
JDK 11 java.base.jmod is the JMOD file for JDK 11 Base module.
JDK 11 Base module compiled class files are stored in \fyicenter\jdk-11.0.1\jmods\java.base.jmod.
JDK 11 Base module compiled class files are also linked and stored in the \fyicenter\jdk-11.0.1\lib\modules JImage file.
JDK 11 Base module source code files are stored in \fyicenter\jdk-11.0.1\lib\src.zip\java.base.
You can click and view the content of each source code file in the list below.
✍: FYIcenter
⏎ java/time/chrono/ChronoLocalDate.java
/* * Copyright (c) 2012, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */ /* * * * * * * Copyright (c) 2012, Stephen Colebourne & Michael Nascimento Santos * * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, * this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, * this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation * and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * * * Neither the name of JSR-310 nor the names of its contributors * may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software * without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR * CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, * EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, * PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR * PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING * NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS * SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ package java.time.chrono; import static java.time.temporal.ChronoField.EPOCH_DAY; import static java.time.temporal.ChronoField.ERA; import static java.time.temporal.ChronoField.YEAR; import static java.time.temporal.ChronoUnit.DAYS; import java.io.Serializable; import java.time.DateTimeException; import java.time.LocalDate; import java.time.LocalTime; import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter; import java.time.temporal.ChronoField; import java.time.temporal.ChronoUnit; import java.time.temporal.Temporal; import java.time.temporal.TemporalAccessor; import java.time.temporal.TemporalAdjuster; import java.time.temporal.TemporalAmount; import java.time.temporal.TemporalField; import java.time.temporal.TemporalQueries; import java.time.temporal.TemporalQuery; import java.time.temporal.TemporalUnit; import java.time.temporal.UnsupportedTemporalTypeException; import java.util.Comparator; import java.util.Objects; /** * A date without time-of-day or time-zone in an arbitrary chronology, intended * for advanced globalization use cases. * <p> * <b>Most applications should declare method signatures, fields and variables * as {@link LocalDate}, not this interface.</b> * <p> * A {@code ChronoLocalDate} is the abstract representation of a date where the * {@code Chronology chronology}, or calendar system, is pluggable. * The date is defined in terms of fields expressed by {@link TemporalField}, * where most common implementations are defined in {@link ChronoField}. * The chronology defines how the calendar system operates and the meaning of * the standard fields. * * <h3>When to use this interface</h3> * The design of the API encourages the use of {@code LocalDate} rather than this * interface, even in the case where the application needs to deal with multiple * calendar systems. * <p> * This concept can seem surprising at first, as the natural way to globalize an * application might initially appear to be to abstract the calendar system. * However, as explored below, abstracting the calendar system is usually the wrong * approach, resulting in logic errors and hard to find bugs. * As such, it should be considered an application-wide architectural decision to choose * to use this interface as opposed to {@code LocalDate}. * * <h3>Architectural issues to consider</h3> * These are some of the points that must be considered before using this interface * throughout an application. * <p> * 1) Applications using this interface, as opposed to using just {@code LocalDate}, * face a significantly higher probability of bugs. This is because the calendar system * in use is not known at development time. A key cause of bugs is where the developer * applies assumptions from their day-to-day knowledge of the ISO calendar system * to code that is intended to deal with any arbitrary calendar system. * The section below outlines how those assumptions can cause problems * The primary mechanism for reducing this increased risk of bugs is a strong code review process. * This should also be considered a extra cost in maintenance for the lifetime of the code. * <p> * 2) This interface does not enforce immutability of implementations. * While the implementation notes indicate that all implementations must be immutable * there is nothing in the code or type system to enforce this. Any method declared * to accept a {@code ChronoLocalDate} could therefore be passed a poorly or * maliciously written mutable implementation. * <p> * 3) Applications using this interface must consider the impact of eras. * {@code LocalDate} shields users from the concept of eras, by ensuring that {@code getYear()} * returns the proleptic year. That decision ensures that developers can think of * {@code LocalDate} instances as consisting of three fields - year, month-of-year and day-of-month. * By contrast, users of this interface must think of dates as consisting of four fields - * era, year-of-era, month-of-year and day-of-month. The extra era field is frequently * forgotten, yet it is of vital importance to dates in an arbitrary calendar system. * For example, in the Japanese calendar system, the era represents the reign of an Emperor. * Whenever one reign ends and another starts, the year-of-era is reset to one. * <p> * 4) The only agreed international standard for passing a date between two systems * is the ISO-8601 standard which requires the ISO calendar system. Using this interface * throughout the application will inevitably lead to the requirement to pass the date * across a network or component boundary, requiring an application specific protocol or format. * <p> * 5) Long term persistence, such as a database, will almost always only accept dates in the * ISO-8601 calendar system (or the related Julian-Gregorian). Passing around dates in other * calendar systems increases the complications of interacting with persistence. * <p> * 6) Most of the time, passing a {@code ChronoLocalDate} throughout an application * is unnecessary, as discussed in the last section below. * * <h3>False assumptions causing bugs in multi-calendar system code</h3> * As indicated above, there are many issues to consider when try to use and manipulate a * date in an arbitrary calendar system. These are some of the key issues. * <p> * Code that queries the day-of-month and assumes that the value will never be more than * 31 is invalid. Some calendar systems have more than 31 days in some months. * <p> * Code that adds 12 months to a date and assumes that a year has been added is invalid. * Some calendar systems have a different number of months, such as 13 in the Coptic or Ethiopic. * <p> * Code that adds one month to a date and assumes that the month-of-year value will increase * by one or wrap to the next year is invalid. Some calendar systems have a variable number * of months in a year, such as the Hebrew. * <p> * Code that adds one month, then adds a second one month and assumes that the day-of-month * will remain close to its original value is invalid. Some calendar systems have a large difference * between the length of the longest month and the length of the shortest month. * For example, the Coptic or Ethiopic have 12 months of 30 days and 1 month of 5 days. * <p> * Code that adds seven days and assumes that a week has been added is invalid. * Some calendar systems have weeks of other than seven days, such as the French Revolutionary. * <p> * Code that assumes that because the year of {@code date1} is greater than the year of {@code date2} * then {@code date1} is after {@code date2} is invalid. This is invalid for all calendar systems * when referring to the year-of-era, and especially untrue of the Japanese calendar system * where the year-of-era restarts with the reign of every new Emperor. * <p> * Code that treats month-of-year one and day-of-month one as the start of the year is invalid. * Not all calendar systems start the year when the month value is one. * <p> * In general, manipulating a date, and even querying a date, is wide open to bugs when the * calendar system is unknown at development time. This is why it is essential that code using * this interface is subjected to additional code reviews. It is also why an architectural * decision to avoid this interface type is usually the correct one. * * <h3>Using LocalDate instead</h3> * The primary alternative to using this interface throughout your application is as follows. * <ul> * <li>Declare all method signatures referring to dates in terms of {@code LocalDate}. * <li>Either store the chronology (calendar system) in the user profile or lookup * the chronology from the user locale * <li>Convert the ISO {@code LocalDate} to and from the user's preferred calendar system during * printing and parsing * </ul> * This approach treats the problem of globalized calendar systems as a localization issue * and confines it to the UI layer. This approach is in keeping with other localization * issues in the java platform. * <p> * As discussed above, performing calculations on a date where the rules of the calendar system * are pluggable requires skill and is not recommended. * Fortunately, the need to perform calculations on a date in an arbitrary calendar system * is extremely rare. For example, it is highly unlikely that the business rules of a library * book rental scheme will allow rentals to be for one month, where meaning of the month * is dependent on the user's preferred calendar system. * <p> * A key use case for calculations on a date in an arbitrary calendar system is producing * a month-by-month calendar for display and user interaction. Again, this is a UI issue, * and use of this interface solely within a few methods of the UI layer may be justified. * <p> * In any other part of the system, where a date must be manipulated in a calendar system * other than ISO, the use case will generally specify the calendar system to use. * For example, an application may need to calculate the next Islamic or Hebrew holiday * which may require manipulating the date. * This kind of use case can be handled as follows: * <ul> * <li>start from the ISO {@code LocalDate} being passed to the method * <li>convert the date to the alternate calendar system, which for this use case is known * rather than arbitrary * <li>perform the calculation * <li>convert back to {@code LocalDate} * </ul> * Developers writing low-level frameworks or libraries should also avoid this interface. * Instead, one of the two general purpose access interfaces should be used. * Use {@link TemporalAccessor} if read-only access is required, or use {@link Temporal} * if read-write access is required. * * @implSpec * This interface must be implemented with care to ensure other classes operate correctly. * All implementations that can be instantiated must be final, immutable and thread-safe. * Subclasses should be Serializable wherever possible. * <p> * Additional calendar systems may be added to the system. * See {@link Chronology} for more details. * * @since 1.8 */ public interface ChronoLocalDate extends Temporal, TemporalAdjuster, Comparable<ChronoLocalDate> { /** * Gets a comparator that compares {@code ChronoLocalDate} in * time-line order ignoring the chronology. * <p> * This comparator differs from the comparison in {@link #compareTo} in that it * only compares the underlying date and not the chronology. * This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based * on the position of the date on the local time-line. * The underlying comparison is equivalent to comparing the epoch-day. * * @return a comparator that compares in time-line order ignoring the chronology * @see #isAfter * @see #isBefore * @see #isEqual */ static Comparator<ChronoLocalDate> timeLineOrder() { return (Comparator<ChronoLocalDate> & Serializable) (date1, date2) -> { return Long.compare(date1.toEpochDay(), date2.toEpochDay()); }; } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Obtains an instance of {@code ChronoLocalDate} from a temporal object. * <p> * This obtains a local date based on the specified temporal. * A {@code TemporalAccessor} represents an arbitrary set of date and time information, * which this factory converts to an instance of {@code ChronoLocalDate}. * <p> * The conversion extracts and combines the chronology and the date * from the temporal object. The behavior is equivalent to using * {@link Chronology#date(TemporalAccessor)} with the extracted chronology. * Implementations are permitted to perform optimizations such as accessing * those fields that are equivalent to the relevant objects. * <p> * This method matches the signature of the functional interface {@link TemporalQuery} * allowing it to be used as a query via method reference, {@code ChronoLocalDate::from}. * * @param temporal the temporal object to convert, not null * @return the date, not null * @throws DateTimeException if unable to convert to a {@code ChronoLocalDate} * @see Chronology#date(TemporalAccessor) */ static ChronoLocalDate from(TemporalAccessor temporal) { if (temporal instanceof ChronoLocalDate) { return (ChronoLocalDate) temporal; } Objects.requireNonNull(temporal, "temporal"); Chronology chrono = temporal.query(TemporalQueries.chronology()); if (chrono == null) { throw new DateTimeException("Unable to obtain ChronoLocalDate from TemporalAccessor: " + temporal.getClass()); } return chrono.date(temporal); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Gets the chronology of this date. * <p> * The {@code Chronology} represents the calendar system in use. * The era and other fields in {@link ChronoField} are defined by the chronology. * * @return the chronology, not null */ Chronology getChronology(); /** * Gets the era, as defined by the chronology. * <p> * The era is, conceptually, the largest division of the time-line. * Most calendar systems have a single epoch dividing the time-line into two eras. * However, some have multiple eras, such as one for the reign of each leader. * The exact meaning is determined by the {@code Chronology}. * <p> * All correctly implemented {@code Era} classes are singletons, thus it * is valid code to write {@code date.getEra() == SomeChrono.ERA_NAME)}. * <p> * This default implementation uses {@link Chronology#eraOf(int)}. * * @return the chronology specific era constant applicable at this date, not null */ default Era getEra() { return getChronology().eraOf(get(ERA)); } /** * Checks if the year is a leap year, as defined by the calendar system. * <p> * A leap-year is a year of a longer length than normal. * The exact meaning is determined by the chronology with the constraint that * a leap-year must imply a year-length longer than a non leap-year. * <p> * This default implementation uses {@link Chronology#isLeapYear(long)}. * * @return true if this date is in a leap year, false otherwise */ default boolean isLeapYear() { return getChronology().isLeapYear(getLong(YEAR)); } /** * Returns the length of the month represented by this date, as defined by the calendar system. * <p> * This returns the length of the month in days. * * @return the length of the month in days */ int lengthOfMonth(); /** * Returns the length of the year represented by this date, as defined by the calendar system. * <p> * This returns the length of the year in days. * <p> * The default implementation uses {@link #isLeapYear()} and returns 365 or 366. * * @return the length of the year in days */ default int lengthOfYear() { return (isLeapYear() ? 366 : 365); } /** * Checks if the specified field is supported. * <p> * This checks if the specified field can be queried on this date. * If false, then calling the {@link #range(TemporalField) range}, * {@link #get(TemporalField) get} and {@link #with(TemporalField, long)} * methods will throw an exception. * <p> * The set of supported fields is defined by the chronology and normally includes * all {@code ChronoField} date fields. * <p> * If the field is not a {@code ChronoField}, then the result of this method * is obtained by invoking {@code TemporalField.isSupportedBy(TemporalAccessor)} * passing {@code this} as the argument. * Whether the field is supported is determined by the field. * * @param field the field to check, null returns false * @return true if the field can be queried, false if not */ @Override default boolean isSupported(TemporalField field) { if (field instanceof ChronoField) { return field.isDateBased(); } return field != null && field.isSupportedBy(this); } /** * Checks if the specified unit is supported. * <p> * This checks if the specified unit can be added to or subtracted from this date. * If false, then calling the {@link #plus(long, TemporalUnit)} and * {@link #minus(long, TemporalUnit) minus} methods will throw an exception. * <p> * The set of supported units is defined by the chronology and normally includes * all {@code ChronoUnit} date units except {@code FOREVER}. * <p> * If the unit is not a {@code ChronoUnit}, then the result of this method * is obtained by invoking {@code TemporalUnit.isSupportedBy(Temporal)} * passing {@code this} as the argument. * Whether the unit is supported is determined by the unit. * * @param unit the unit to check, null returns false * @return true if the unit can be added/subtracted, false if not */ @Override default boolean isSupported(TemporalUnit unit) { if (unit instanceof ChronoUnit) { return unit.isDateBased(); } return unit != null && unit.isSupportedBy(this); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- // override for covariant return type /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate with(TemporalAdjuster adjuster) { return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), Temporal.super.with(adjuster)); } /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws UnsupportedTemporalTypeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate with(TemporalField field, long newValue) { if (field instanceof ChronoField) { throw new UnsupportedTemporalTypeException("Unsupported field: " + field); } return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), field.adjustInto(this, newValue)); } /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate plus(TemporalAmount amount) { return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), Temporal.super.plus(amount)); } /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate plus(long amountToAdd, TemporalUnit unit) { if (unit instanceof ChronoUnit) { throw new UnsupportedTemporalTypeException("Unsupported unit: " + unit); } return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), unit.addTo(this, amountToAdd)); } /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate minus(TemporalAmount amount) { return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), Temporal.super.minus(amount)); } /** * {@inheritDoc} * @throws DateTimeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws UnsupportedTemporalTypeException {@inheritDoc} * @throws ArithmeticException {@inheritDoc} */ @Override default ChronoLocalDate minus(long amountToSubtract, TemporalUnit unit) { return ChronoLocalDateImpl.ensureValid(getChronology(), Temporal.super.minus(amountToSubtract, unit)); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Queries this date using the specified query. * <p> * This queries this date using the specified query strategy object. * The {@code TemporalQuery} object defines the logic to be used to * obtain the result. Read the documentation of the query to understand * what the result of this method will be. * <p> * The result of this method is obtained by invoking the * {@link TemporalQuery#queryFrom(TemporalAccessor)} method on the * specified query passing {@code this} as the argument. * * @param <R> the type of the result * @param query the query to invoke, not null * @return the query result, null may be returned (defined by the query) * @throws DateTimeException if unable to query (defined by the query) * @throws ArithmeticException if numeric overflow occurs (defined by the query) */ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") @Override default <R> R query(TemporalQuery<R> query) { if (query == TemporalQueries.zoneId() || query == TemporalQueries.zone() || query == TemporalQueries.offset()) { return null; } else if (query == TemporalQueries.localTime()) { return null; } else if (query == TemporalQueries.chronology()) { return (R) getChronology(); } else if (query == TemporalQueries.precision()) { return (R) DAYS; } // inline TemporalAccessor.super.query(query) as an optimization // non-JDK classes are not permitted to make this optimization return query.queryFrom(this); } /** * Adjusts the specified temporal object to have the same date as this object. * <p> * This returns a temporal object of the same observable type as the input * with the date changed to be the same as this. * <p> * The adjustment is equivalent to using {@link Temporal#with(TemporalField, long)} * passing {@link ChronoField#EPOCH_DAY} as the field. * <p> * In most cases, it is clearer to reverse the calling pattern by using * {@link Temporal#with(TemporalAdjuster)}: * <pre> * // these two lines are equivalent, but the second approach is recommended * temporal = thisLocalDate.adjustInto(temporal); * temporal = temporal.with(thisLocalDate); * </pre> * <p> * This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call. * * @param temporal the target object to be adjusted, not null * @return the adjusted object, not null * @throws DateTimeException if unable to make the adjustment * @throws ArithmeticException if numeric overflow occurs */ @Override default Temporal adjustInto(Temporal temporal) { return temporal.with(EPOCH_DAY, toEpochDay()); } /** * Calculates the amount of time until another date in terms of the specified unit. * <p> * This calculates the amount of time between two {@code ChronoLocalDate} * objects in terms of a single {@code TemporalUnit}. * The start and end points are {@code this} and the specified date. * The result will be negative if the end is before the start. * The {@code Temporal} passed to this method is converted to a * {@code ChronoLocalDate} using {@link Chronology#date(TemporalAccessor)}. * The calculation returns a whole number, representing the number of * complete units between the two dates. * For example, the amount in days between two dates can be calculated * using {@code startDate.until(endDate, DAYS)}. * <p> * There are two equivalent ways of using this method. * The first is to invoke this method. * The second is to use {@link TemporalUnit#between(Temporal, Temporal)}: * <pre> * // these two lines are equivalent * amount = start.until(end, MONTHS); * amount = MONTHS.between(start, end); * </pre> * The choice should be made based on which makes the code more readable. * <p> * The calculation is implemented in this method for {@link ChronoUnit}. * The units {@code DAYS}, {@code WEEKS}, {@code MONTHS}, {@code YEARS}, * {@code DECADES}, {@code CENTURIES}, {@code MILLENNIA} and {@code ERAS} * should be supported by all implementations. * Other {@code ChronoUnit} values will throw an exception. * <p> * If the unit is not a {@code ChronoUnit}, then the result of this method * is obtained by invoking {@code TemporalUnit.between(Temporal, Temporal)} * passing {@code this} as the first argument and the converted input temporal as * the second argument. * <p> * This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call. * * @param endExclusive the end date, exclusive, which is converted to a * {@code ChronoLocalDate} in the same chronology, not null * @param unit the unit to measure the amount in, not null * @return the amount of time between this date and the end date * @throws DateTimeException if the amount cannot be calculated, or the end * temporal cannot be converted to a {@code ChronoLocalDate} * @throws UnsupportedTemporalTypeException if the unit is not supported * @throws ArithmeticException if numeric overflow occurs */ @Override // override for Javadoc long until(Temporal endExclusive, TemporalUnit unit); /** * Calculates the period between this date and another date as a {@code ChronoPeriod}. * <p> * This calculates the period between two dates. All supplied chronologies * calculate the period using years, months and days, however the * {@code ChronoPeriod} API allows the period to be represented using other units. * <p> * The start and end points are {@code this} and the specified date. * The result will be negative if the end is before the start. * The negative sign will be the same in each of year, month and day. * <p> * The calculation is performed using the chronology of this date. * If necessary, the input date will be converted to match. * <p> * This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call. * * @param endDateExclusive the end date, exclusive, which may be in any chronology, not null * @return the period between this date and the end date, not null * @throws DateTimeException if the period cannot be calculated * @throws ArithmeticException if numeric overflow occurs */ ChronoPeriod until(ChronoLocalDate endDateExclusive); /** * Formats this date using the specified formatter. * <p> * This date will be passed to the formatter to produce a string. * <p> * The default implementation must behave as follows: * <pre> * return formatter.format(this); * </pre> * * @param formatter the formatter to use, not null * @return the formatted date string, not null * @throws DateTimeException if an error occurs during printing */ default String format(DateTimeFormatter formatter) { Objects.requireNonNull(formatter, "formatter"); return formatter.format(this); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Combines this date with a time to create a {@code ChronoLocalDateTime}. * <p> * This returns a {@code ChronoLocalDateTime} formed from this date at the specified time. * All possible combinations of date and time are valid. * * @param localTime the local time to use, not null * @return the local date-time formed from this date and the specified time, not null */ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") default ChronoLocalDateTime<?> atTime(LocalTime localTime) { return ChronoLocalDateTimeImpl.of(this, localTime); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Converts this date to the Epoch Day. * <p> * The {@link ChronoField#EPOCH_DAY Epoch Day count} is a simple * incrementing count of days where day 0 is 1970-01-01 (ISO). * This definition is the same for all chronologies, enabling conversion. * <p> * This default implementation queries the {@code EPOCH_DAY} field. * * @return the Epoch Day equivalent to this date */ default long toEpochDay() { return getLong(EPOCH_DAY); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Compares this date to another date, including the chronology. * <p> * The comparison is based first on the underlying time-line date, then * on the chronology. * It is "consistent with equals", as defined by {@link Comparable}. * <p> * For example, the following is the comparator order: * <ol> * <li>{@code 2012-12-03 (ISO)}</li> * <li>{@code 2012-12-04 (ISO)}</li> * <li>{@code 2555-12-04 (ThaiBuddhist)}</li> * <li>{@code 2012-12-05 (ISO)}</li> * </ol> * Values #2 and #3 represent the same date on the time-line. * When two values represent the same date, the chronology ID is compared to distinguish them. * This step is needed to make the ordering "consistent with equals". * <p> * If all the date objects being compared are in the same chronology, then the * additional chronology stage is not required and only the local date is used. * To compare the dates of two {@code TemporalAccessor} instances, including dates * in two different chronologies, use {@link ChronoField#EPOCH_DAY} as a comparator. * <p> * This default implementation performs the comparison defined above. * * @param other the other date to compare to, not null * @return the comparator value, negative if less, positive if greater */ @Override default int compareTo(ChronoLocalDate other) { int cmp = Long.compare(toEpochDay(), other.toEpochDay()); if (cmp == 0) { cmp = getChronology().compareTo(other.getChronology()); } return cmp; } /** * Checks if this date is after the specified date ignoring the chronology. * <p> * This method differs from the comparison in {@link #compareTo} in that it * only compares the underlying date and not the chronology. * This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based * on the time-line position. * This is equivalent to using {@code date1.toEpochDay() > date2.toEpochDay()}. * <p> * This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day. * * @param other the other date to compare to, not null * @return true if this is after the specified date */ default boolean isAfter(ChronoLocalDate other) { return this.toEpochDay() > other.toEpochDay(); } /** * Checks if this date is before the specified date ignoring the chronology. * <p> * This method differs from the comparison in {@link #compareTo} in that it * only compares the underlying date and not the chronology. * This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based * on the time-line position. * This is equivalent to using {@code date1.toEpochDay() < date2.toEpochDay()}. * <p> * This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day. * * @param other the other date to compare to, not null * @return true if this is before the specified date */ default boolean isBefore(ChronoLocalDate other) { return this.toEpochDay() < other.toEpochDay(); } /** * Checks if this date is equal to the specified date ignoring the chronology. * <p> * This method differs from the comparison in {@link #compareTo} in that it * only compares the underlying date and not the chronology. * This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based * on the time-line position. * This is equivalent to using {@code date1.toEpochDay() == date2.toEpochDay()}. * <p> * This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day. * * @param other the other date to compare to, not null * @return true if the underlying date is equal to the specified date */ default boolean isEqual(ChronoLocalDate other) { return this.toEpochDay() == other.toEpochDay(); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Checks if this date is equal to another date, including the chronology. * <p> * Compares this date with another ensuring that the date and chronology are the same. * <p> * To compare the dates of two {@code TemporalAccessor} instances, including dates * in two different chronologies, use {@link ChronoField#EPOCH_DAY} as a comparator. * * @param obj the object to check, null returns false * @return true if this is equal to the other date */ @Override boolean equals(Object obj); /** * A hash code for this date. * * @return a suitable hash code */ @Override int hashCode(); //----------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * Outputs this date as a {@code String}. * <p> * The output will include the full local date. * * @return the formatted date, not null */ @Override String toString(); }
⏎ java/time/chrono/ChronoLocalDate.java
Or download all of them as a single archive file:
File name: java.base-11.0.1-src.zip File size: 8740354 bytes Release date: 2018-11-04 Download
2020-05-29, 256821👍, 0💬
Popular Posts:
Smack is an Open Source XMPP (Jabber) client library for instant messaging and presence. A pure Java...
What Is junit-3.8.1.jar? junit-3.8.1.jar is the version 3.8.1 of JUnit JAR library file. JUnit is a ...
Rhino JavaScript Java Library is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Jav...
Apache ZooKeeper is an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination. Ap...
Saxon-HE (home edition) is an open source product available under the Mozilla Public License. It pro...